Résumé
Background: With NHS PrEP now available for those at risk, we aimed to identify missed opportunities for people newly diagnosed with HIV who attended sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, and to determine the HIV outcomes associated with people acquiring HIV with previous or recent PrEP use. Method(s): A retrospective observational study reviewed all new HIV diagnoses from the last 2 years to see if they were eligible for PrEP and offered in SRH services. Data was collected using electronic medical records on HIV outcomes - virological suppression, resistance and antiretroviral choice. Result(s): There were 74 new HIV diagnoses. 41 people were eligible but only 10 were known to have accessed PrEP at our services. 21% were heterosexual and of black ethnicity - it was not possible to ascertain whether they were eligible for PrEP from the notes. Of the 10 people with recent PrEP use, 2 stopped due to side effects;headaches, vomiting, fatigue and renal toxicity concerns. For the remaining adherence concerns were reported - taking event based dosing (EBD) incorrectly and difficulty accessing services. 80% of people achieved virological suppression. 90% were put on a second generation integrase or protease inhibitor. No one developed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. 6 people eligible for PrEP had attended SRH services but not given PrEP. 2 attended during the IMPACT trial being full and referred to IwantPrEPnow. 2 attended during COVID where baseline bloods were done with follow up but subsequently tested positive. 2 people refused PrEP with 1 deeming themselves to be low risk. Conclusion(s): Our data highlights several missed opportunities for starting same-day PrEP which potentially may have prevented HIV acquisition. If PrEP is not issued on the day, adequate follow up must be ensured. Reassuringly those who acquired HIV with recent PrEP use have achieved good virological control without NRTI mutations. Counselling on potential side effects, EBD dosing and ongoing HIV risk are essential. Despite NHS PrEP available over 2 years, our data shows we are still failing to meet the demand of PrEP not only in men who have sex with men but also in other key at risk groups.
Résumé
This paper explores the impact of policy changes and budget cuts on services and support faced by people with learning disabilities. Drawing upon collaborative research in England and Scotland and interviews with commissioners and support organisations, we show how landscapes of care and support are unstable and fragmented. We identify how pressures of time, resource and precaritisation in the workforce are creating ‘debilitating landscapes of care' that further erode the capacities of both the people that work in the sector and people with learning disabilities. Some challenges that people with learning disabilities face in this context include finding appropriate local support, narrowing access as a result of reductions in benefit entitlements and identifying quality providers amid a complex array of private and charitable provision. Capacity to cope with these challenges is contingent on access to quality advocacy, supportive family, friendships, productive occupational learning environments and peer support, but these are not always available. The impact of COVID-19 has only served to intensify some of the issues we identify and the urgent need for a response. Our analysis is inspired by Berlant's (2007) conception of ‘slow-death' and Puar's (2017) associated conceptualisation of ‘debility'. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Résumé
This paper explores the impact of policy changes and budget cuts on services and support faced by people with learning disabilities. Drawing upon collaborative research in England and Scotland and interviews with commissioners and support organisations, we show how landscapes of care and support are unstable and fragmented. We identify how pressures of time, resource and precaritisation in the workforce are creating 'debilitating landscapes of care' that further erode the capacities of both the people that work in the sector and people with learning disabilities. Some challenges that people with learning disabilities face in this context include finding appropriate local support, narrowing access as a result of reductions in benefit entitlements and identifying quality providers amid a complex array of private and charitable provision. Capacity to cope with these challenges is contingent on access to quality advocacy, supportive family, friendships, productive occupational learning environments and peer support, but these are not always available. The impact of COVID-19 has only served to intensify some of the issues we identify and the urgent need for a response. Our analysis is inspired by Berlant's (2007) conception of 'slow-death' and Puar's (2017) associated conceptualisation of 'debility'.